Search for: "Saffell"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2009, 9:49 am
On June 17, 2009, Michigan Supreme Court entered an order affirming a 2008 Michigan Court of Appeals decision, which had held that Michigan law did not recognize claims for innocent misrepresentation under the Michigan Seller Disclosure Act (MCL 565.951, et seq).As we reported in an earlier posting (here), Roberts v Saffell involved a claim that Defendant Sellers failed to disclose a termite infestation in the home they sold to Plaintiff Buyers. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 3:18 am
Roberts v Saffell, ___ Mich App ___ (2008) (Lawyers Weekly No. 07-67463 - 12 pages) (published opinion) (Markey, J., joined by Wilder, J.) [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:56 am
Mike Saffell. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 5:49 am
No. 230, 991 F.2d 1316 (7th Cir. 1993) (school officials did not violate sixteen-year old student's constitutional rights when they strip-searched him based on a reasonable suspicion that he was concealing drugs); Saffell v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:27 am
Saffell, 74 Cal.App.2d Supp. 967 (California Court of Appeals 1946).) [read post]
